ADL Newsletter for Educators and Educational Researchers

Academic ADL Co-Lab logo

Advanced Distributed Learning for Educators and Educational Researchers

January 2006

IN THIS ISSUE

Purpose of Newsletter

Introduction to ADL

The ADL Vision

What is ADL Doing about Its Vision?

Instructional Implications of ADL Capabilities

Future Directions for Education and ADL

Publications Dealing with ADL


ADL ADOPTION


ADL has received a large international following and adoption of SCORM. The most active international participants include:

  • Japan
  • Germany
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Taiwan
  • Canada
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
  • Switzerland
  • France

Third-party certification is available for Learning Management Systems (LMSs) and for content. 24 products have successfully completed SCORM 2004:

  • Content Packages: 10
  • LMSs: 14

For SCORM Version 1.2, there have been a total of 107 products completing certification (some in more than one category):

  • Content Packages: 42
  • LMSs: 62
  • Meta-data: 25
  • SCOs: 31

Technical Guidelines for Digital Learning Content

One of the most active Academic ADL Co-Lab partners is the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) with 16 member states.

A committee formed by the SREB created a very useful document. The 20 suggested guidelines identify the minimum technical requirements for digital learning content. While not directly addressing instructional quality, they encourage the development of all content to the same standards, thus enabling selection of content based on quality rather than on accessibility, technical interoperability, or compatibility with a specific application (such as a Learning Management System).

The guidelines are part of a continuing effort by SREB and its many contributors to keep digital learning content timely and useful. Intended users include digital learning content providers, developers, distributors, procurement officials and users.


 

 

Newsletter Archive

Current ADL Newsletter

 

Purpose of Newsletter

The purpose of this Newsletter is to continue a dialogue among educators, educational researchers, and the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) community. The dialog was started by contacts with educators and educational researchers and by presentations at various professional meetings. There was a good deal of interest in ADL at these occasions, so we petitioned the American Educational Research Association (AERA) to form a Special Interest Group (SIG) to facilitate the dialogue. Our petition was denied because of concerns that it may overlap with established SIGs. We were asked to identify common areas of interest with these SIGs.

We have established contact with several AERA SIGs to work out collaborative arrangements. If we bring 43 new members into an existing SIG, we will be guaranteed one session at AERA’s annual meeting. We will be urging you to sign up for a SIG, once we have worked out the arrangements

This first issue of this Newsletter is intended to introduce ADL to educators and educational researchers who have little familiarity with it. We will list sources where more detailed information can be obtained, and summarize recent ADL developments.

Back to top


Introduction to ADL

ADL is intended to enhance the efficiency of education and training programs by making instruction, performance aiding, performance support, as well as scheduling, registration and other administrative materials for instruction available on the Internet anytime and anywhere to anyone who needs them. It emphasizes the use of asynchronous, computer-mediated instruction to achieve its objectives. Presently over 5,000,000 instructional objects have been developed for ADL and more are in continual preparation.

This Newsletter is intended to engage educators and educational researchers in an active dialogue with the ADL community so that the instructional objects developed for ADL can be as useful for education and educational research as they already are for training. The training community has reacted to ADL with enthusiasm and over 75 percent of ADL instructional objects are equally applicable to education and training. In education, the K-12 Cyber Home Learning System in Korea is the largest user of ADL technologies with 840,000 students, attesting to the importance of ADL to education.

The ADL initiative was undertaken by the Department of Defense at the request of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and in cooperation with other Federal Agencies. It is being pursued through intense and frequent interactions among industry, government, and academic participants. ADL has received wide acceptance and its specifications are now being adopted across Europe, Asia, the Pacific Rim, and the Americas.

ADL presents both opportunities and challenges for instruction in many settings. Its anytime, anywhere capabilities can be used in K-16 classrooms, workplaces, conference rooms, job sites, and homes. The open access provided by ADL outside of schools will require teachers, administrators, and policy makers, as well as students, to assume new and unaccustomed roles and responsibilities. These ADL affordances will also provide new questions to be addressed by educational researchers.

Back to top


The ADL Vision

We assume that in the near future much of what is learned will be based on open, anytime, anywhere access to something approximating the whole of human knowledge. This access will be achieved through a variety of capabilities, many of which, such as computer technology, global communications, and the World Wide Web (and its successors), are already in place.

The development of computer technology makes both educational content and tailored, tutorial interactions accessible (anytime, anywhere) and affordable. ADL capabilities help adapt instruction to each learner’s abilities, prior knowledge, interests, and preferred learning modes. Of course, a good deal of research will be needed to determine the optimal paths for such adaptations. Education (and training) interactions may eventually use ADL instructional objects to generate – in real time and on demand -- tutorial conversations that allow the free flowing mixed initiative interactions characteristic of true conversation. The common thread of accessibility anytime, anywhere is obvious in these developments. Like writing and books, the impact of ADL on the processes and institutions of education and training are likely to be significant, and worthy of attention .

Personal learning associates may mediate ADL capabilities; these associates will be wireless, voice-interactive, and also capable of multimedia modes of interaction. Physically, these devices may be hand-held (possibly combined with the game-playing, photograph-taking, instant-messaging, video telephones we have today) or even worn on clothing.

Back to top


What is ADL Doing about Its Vision?

If education and training are to tap into the World Wide Web, they will need to identify and access some sort of instructional objects that are accessible, portable, durable, and reusable. In other words, it must be possible to find and retrieve objects that will operate in most computing environments, continue to operate despite changes (modifications, updates, and revisions) in these environments, and be (re)usable in many topics. In short, the future of learning may be based to a significant degree on what has been called an "educational object economy." In such an economy the focus in devising instructional interactions shifts from developing new objects to identifying, locating, and assembling existing objects into relevant instructional material -- as needed by individual students for their own purposes.

Development of the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) was based on these considerations. SCORM defines the interrelationship of instructional objects, data models, and protocols so that objects may be shared across systems. SCORM does not specify any particular computing platform, operating system, application language, or instructional strategy. It relies on virtual interfaces to ensure that whatever the objects do, they can be incorporated into an ongoing presentation – or tutorial conversation. SCORM is now stabilized and being used to create education, training, and performance aiding materials. More than five million objects conforming to SCORM specifications exist and are now in use. The most recent version of SCORM may be accessed at www.adlnet.org.

CORDRA (Content Object Repository, Discovery, and Resolution Architecture) is a related development. It is focused on identifying (“discovering”) and then locating the precise instructional object(s) needed for an application. CORDRA relies on metadata to specify and locate objects, but its system of registries will allow access to any registered, but locally controlled, repository. Its naming conventions will track objects as they are modified and moved from repository to repository.

The Semantic Web is also included in ADL planning. The Semantic Web is intended to improve cooperation between computers and human beings by imbuing Web information with meaning. Through a system of ontologies, it will identify and expose semantic linkages between quite disparate bodies of information. It will allow more comprehensive and substantive models of subject matter domains and learners’ levels of mastery than we now have and combine them with more precise discovery of the instructional objects needed to produce desired human competencies.

Back to top


Instructional Implications of ADL Capabilities

Four implications for instruction, among others, may arise from the ADL teaching-learning environment:

  • Less pre-defined sequencing. Instructional design as a process of pre-specifying and pre-defining a sequence of activities will need to evolve if the ADL vision of on-demand, real-time access is to be fully realized. Doing so may be more important in education where objectives are necessarily more flexible than they are in training where all students must achieve a threshold of job or task competency.
  • More assessment and fewer tests. Assessment will become continuous and unobtrusive as capabilities evolve for developing a model of the learner from routine interactions. The development of this type of assessment, and the explicit forms of evaluation to accompany it, will require integrated contributions from cognitive psychologists, psychometricians, and instructional designers.
  • Fewer ‘lessons.’ The notion of instructional modules will need to evolve to support instructional interactions much like conversations that can be generated on-demand and in real-time.
  • More reliable outcomes. Instruction will need to become more of an engineering discipline in which specific outcomes are reliably achieved. This discipline will rely on detailed knowledge of the learner’s prior and developing knowledge matched with comprehensive representations of the subject matter and instructional techniques.

Back to top


Future Directions for Education and ADL

Many parts of the ADL vision still require extensive research and development. However, ADL techniques and instructional objects are being increasingly used to provide instruction, performance aiding, and decision aiding in government and industry, in addition to its use in K-12 Cyber Home Learning System in Korea. We expect that the use in Korean schools is only a beginning for ADL’s eventual worldwide utilization in schools at all levels.

With or without ADL, fully accessible, affordable, anytime, anywhere education and training seem inevitable. Sooner or later, our instructional institutions must deal with this evolution and its emerging processes, capabilities, and opportunities. Involvement and collaboration of professional educators and educational researchers are needed to help shape ADL development and its integration with K-16 education. This Newsletter and our affiliation with an existing AERA SIG are some of the ways of encouraging that development. The goal, of course, is not technology or even instructional and problem solving functionalities, but the full and universal realization of each individual’s potential.

If you have suggestions, articles, or resources related to ADL’s objectives please send these materials, and anything else you would like us to consider publishing in the Newsletter, to the Editor, so that we can share your ideas with others who receive this Newsletter.

Robert Wisher, Department of Defense
Dexter Fletcher, Institute for Defense Analysis,
Sigmund Tobias, Teachers College, Columbia University, Newsletter Editor

Back to top


Publications Dealing with ADL

The most comprehensive listing of information dealing with ADL is at the website www.adlnet.org, including the most recent version of the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM). Publications and presentations dealing with ADL are listed on that web site, though they are not specifically intended for educators and educational researchers. An annotated listing of the latter sources are given below. Subscribers to this Newsletter are encouraged to send publications and presentations relevant to ADL, a very brief description of the materials, and where they may be accessed for listing in this space.

Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2003). Implications of advanced distributed learning for education (Urban Diversity Series). New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. http://iume.tc.columbia.edu/eric_archive/mono/UDS118.pdf
An extended discussion of ADL and its implications for instruction generally, and learning in education specifically.

Tobias, S. (2005) Instructional adaptations, adaptive instruction, and advanced distributed learning.
http://iume.tc.columbia.edu/downloads/tobias/ADL_paper_st.pdf
A discussion of the implications of ADL for adaptive instruction with suggestions for research.

Wisher, R. A. & Fletcher, J. D. (2004) The Case for Advanced Distributed Learning, Information & Security: An International Journal, 14, 17-25, http://cms.isn.ch/public/docs/doc_6972_259_en.pdf

An overview of empirical findings on the effectiveness of distributed learning technologies.

Back to top

Academic ADL Co-Lab
222 W. Washington Ave.
Suite 470
Madison, WI 53703
Phone: 608.263.6657
Fax: 608.265.0070
www.academiccolab.org